Network for the Environment and Social (Human) Security

Social and Human Security

Posted by on Mar 19, 2011 in Sustainability | 8 comments

Shop Now

This Article is Listed in Sustainability Section, and has been viewed

(1196)

times.

GD Star Rating
loading...

If Social Security is mentioned in Nesseq.com, it is meant in a European sense and not in the American one. Some call it Human Security (1), which is also valid. The difference is, that Human Security is about the individual and his place in society is not defined. Social Security is about the security of the individual in society. Social security has nothing to do with Welfare. It is rather about, how secure is my place in society?

This is best achieved, by supplying jobs!

One has a job, ones status in society is secure. That is the meaning of Social Security. The best would be, if the jobs could help to save technical energy. Instead of using a machine, let a person do the work.

An example, in a big kitchen, cooking for hundred’s of people, things have to be lifted. Pretty heavy, a soup and the height is 1-2 meters. Is an electric lift really necessary, or could the work been done manually with a winch? That was the way it was done a mere hundred, and less, years ago. How much energy could be saved with such a stance?

The initial investment in such a kitchen could be much smaller, since the electrical cables must not be installed and the electric lift is, it never is, cheap. Since almost all aspects of manual labor has become, or is becoming, technicized, human being has evolved to a button pusher. All the work is done by a machine, so people have to work out or jog, so the body is moved at all.

The less techology is used in society, the more jobs are created. Some will say, those jobs are so called Mc Jobs (2). Low level work without need for elaborate training.

But who can claim, that the street sweeper, the garbage man and the sewage worker are less important, than for instance, a medical doctor. Without the city hygienists, society would need more doctors. Who would recommend to keep the city clean!

This is not the only aspect. Modern society is not sustainable. There seems to be no dissent about this point, too much is talked about sustainable Development. To limit this to the, so called, development countries is not right. In regard to sustainable development, also the highly technicized countries are developing countries. These countries have a pretty high base unemployment rate. In most countries it is slightly less than 10% of the over all work force. In the 80th of the last century the talk in the academic, political and economic circles was the Service Society. A society, which is less industrial and a big part of the work force is simply rendering services. The question is, why don’t we allow long term unemployed people to work in such Mc Jobs. It would be better for the self esteem to earn a fair salary, than to be dependent on welfare. Money could be saved and the vicious circle of unemployment and poverty could be broken.

Retired people the forgoten human resource.

Why is it, that elderly women and men, who have raised a bunch of children and are retired, could not be asked to watch out for children in nursing homes? Thus the retired people still have a task. The shift could be a mere 2 hours, in which the people have a tea and a talk. And at the same time watch out for the children. The same Social Service could be rendered could be in nursing homes as well. Also it does not have to be limited to elderly people, handicapped people could to the same.

This would be a practical integration of all parties involved. The retired people would not feel useless and the handicapped people would come more into the center of society. As of now, those people are concentrated in special work shops, somewhere at the outskirts of town. And the children would learn, that there are other old people as your grand parents and also handicapped people. All the people, healthy or not, old and young are part of society and the children have to learn every aspect of life. Thus they children would also learn to take responsibility, because they will be watching the elderly and needy.

To integrate people in social services, would help to ease the burden of the nurses. Who could allocate more time for the really hard cases.

This is true Social Security.

For further reading:

1. Human Security

2. Mc Jobs

Share Button

8 Comments

Join the conversation and post a comment.

  1. Jalisa Timko

    I’ve been hoping to uncover a listing like this for ages due to the fact there are such a lot of distinct opinions about this. Thank you.

  2. Luigi Fulk

    I simply want to tell you that I’m very new to weblog and honestly savored your website. Most likely I’m likely to bookmark your blog post . You really come with exceptional well written articles. Regards for revealing your website page.

  3. Jaime Aljemal

    I’d just prefer to letvv y0u know hvow much I find out from your wisdom Liked it.Desire to be back quick for some a lot more good posts

  4. Samuel Laiben

    Wow, usually really great to discover other folks through the hole world in my looking, I critically appreciate the time it ought to have taken to location collectively this excellent post. kind regards

  5. strong

    Pretty fine post. I just stumbled upon your blog and I have to say that I have actually enjoyed reading your blog posts. I’ll be subscribing to your feed anyway and I hope you’ll post again soon. Big thanks for the wholesome information.

  6. offshore bank account

    Bismarck was ..looking for a way to win the support of the working people who were unhappy with the high taxes ..needed to support the large German military and the high prices created by the government-protected ..industrial cartels…He wanted to find a way to con people into believing that they were ..going to get something from the state without its actually having to deliver. Bismarck then set the age of ..eligibility for his social security system at 65 knowing full well that most of the people would have ..died before they received a dime from the system. In spite of this the system was wildly popular…The Prussian concept of Social Security was an authoritarian one ..based on the false premise that people are incompetent to look after their own affairs and need a ..paternalistic socialist state to force them to provide for their own retirement…In the US during the 1930s President Franklin D.

  7. Louis Eugene Carabini

    It is immensely popular with people in all strata of society because it is an extraordinary good deal if you live long enough. But that is a subject for another setting…So essentially McCains plan must be characterized as simply doing nothing effectively cutting benefits to the people who paid for them already. And that characterization that they have paid for them may elicit some criticism from people who do not understand that the Greenspan plan was an exception to the formula of Social Security.

  8. Todd Knesel

    I appreciate you sharing this article post.Really thank you! Will read on…

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *