Network for the Environment and Social (Human) Security

Tony Blair’s Way of Life

Posted by on Jan 28, 2011 in Ecology | 8 comments

Shop Now

This Article is Listed in Ecology Section, and has been viewed

(1013)

times.

GD Star Rating
loading...

There was never really peace during the reign of humanity on earth. The reasons were always different but there was always one final answer – war.  Wars about a way of life. Either mine or yours!

Today it is a clash of cultures and the respective ways of life. The still very powerful way of the western culture is being challenged by many different ways of life. All the emerging Superpowers, like China, India and South America exert pressure on the western way of life. But as of now the Islamic fundamentalism is the most pressing problem for the west, because some Muslims are willing to employ terrorism against the west.  

What could be the reasons, that lead a person to blow him/herself up and to kill as many civilians as possible?  

The argument, that those people were brain washed sounds rather like an excuse and not like an explanation. The terrorists are only the visible tip of an Iceberg of a mass of frustrated, dissatisfied and humiliated people. People, who provide the terror with a infrastructure of, at least, sympathy and understanding. And those people are not just a few.  

Why are the people frustrated?    

Is it because the West, Europe as a former colonial power and now the USA always mingled in the internal affairs of whole continents? Africa and the Near East have been divided by the colonial powers withe a ruler. That’s why the borders are simply straight and the drawing of them were without regards to the people affected.  

Isn’t colonialism already a fight against the way of live of the colonized? Doesn’t the politics of the USA do the same? Congressman Ron Paul, a Republican, from Texas as a clear opinion about it.  

The former British prime minister Tony Blair (1) said in his second appearance before the British investigative panel on the Iraq War II, chaired by Sir John Chilcot: “The West has to get out of this – what I think is a wretched policy, or posture of apology, for believing that we are causing fact is that they are doing it because they disagree fundamentally with our way of life, and they will carry on doing it unless they are met with the requisite determination and, if necessary, force.”  

So colonialism has nothing to do with the situation? The arrogance of the West has nothing to do with it? Just now I follow the news about the unrest in Egypt. The population is really angry at the undemocratic government, which is supported by the West. Another example how the West defines democracy is Gaza. The Hamas was elected there democratically and as soon as it got into office, Israel and the West talked about toppling the government. This is a direct contradiction to the Sunday speeches of the West about exporting democracy into the world. All this is a matter of discussion in a more esoteric way, when we talk about the big picture, but the affects on the individual is ignored. This is exactly the kind of humiliation that has been mentioned before.  

Another form of humiliation is, that the West thinks is it’s prerogative to employ nuclear power to secure their energy future (2). Other countries, like Iran, do not have the same rights. Of course, nuclear power and nuclear weapons go hand in hand.  

It is not in the interest of the world to employ nuclear power. This is a technology, which is very dangerous if it gets out of control. Chernobyl in 1986 showed us what can happen. The more such technology is employed the chances grow that something bad will happen again. The only way to secure energy supply to a growing world population is to change our perception of the infrastructure. We have to get away from the centralized and megalomaniac infrastructure to a infrastructure of small circuit and a technology appropriate for human beings and nature. This is the quintessence of Sustainability.  

Mr. Blair said during his incumbency something in this respect.  

The blunt truth about the politics of climate change is that no country will want to sacrifice its economy in order to meet this challenge, but all economies know that the only sensible long term way of developing is to do it on a sustainable basis. (3) 
Perhaps Mr. Blair should think about what he said and try to find a way of sustainable life come true, instead of starting a new war!  

   

1. Tony Blair I   

 2.  The G8 and Nuclear Power  

 3. Tony Blair II      

  

Share Button

8 Comments

Join the conversation and post a comment.

  1. Beverley Orsi

    This is one of the great post in this topic, thanks you very much for your post! please keep the good post going! I willbe back for more!

  2. Linser

    Enjoy reading your posts – keep it up.

  3. Diana

    Rest in Peace Max Nadel, i hope you can read this in your bext life, sorry about your death.

    • Stan

      Some bloggers will do whatever it takes to make sure people read their bullcrap…looool Well…what can I say? 🙂

  4. Russ Santoro

    Im really impressed with the looks of this!

  5. Samara

    Really good details! I have been seeking something such as this for a long time now. Thanks for the tips!

  6. 離婚

    I appreciate your blog and will subscribe to your atom feed so I can read anytime. Wonderful information,

  7. Alisha Hogland

    Always good to see, this was apparent a brilliant post. In idea I want to write like this too. You want time to creat that informative and in addition several effort to generate a brilliant post.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *